Monday, March 29, 2021

Urasoe city council passes the "Sexual and Gender Diversity Ordinance"

    Urasoe, Okinawa -- The Urasoe city council made a unanimous vote on Tuesday to pass the "Inclusion of Sexual and Gender Diversity in Society Ordinance," which includes the same-sex partnership system and etc. The first bylaw specializing in sexual and gender diversity in the prefecture came into effect on October 1.

    The basic principle of the "Inclusion of Sexual and Gender Diversity in Society Ordinance" is to eliminate social prejudice and discrimination against gender and sexual minorities and to promote respect and understanding of sexual and gender diversity. This is to celebrate everyone's freedom of expression and uniqueness without the fear of discrimination and allow them to make lifestyle choices on their own terms. This ordinance will protect LGBT folks from harassment and prevent outing incidents.

 It also places the responsibility on the city and the employers to create a safe work environment for sexual and gender minorities. Meanwhile for the education system, it demands to incorporate a curriculum that promotes awareness and respect for gender and sexual diversity. Furthermore, it includes the "partnership system" that considers relationships of same-sex couples as married couples. Naha is the second city in Okinawa to introduce the partnership system. The detailed guidelines of the system will be put into law soon.

 Urasoe Mayor Matsumoto has always been an ally to the LGBT community. He visited and gave a speech at a gay volleyball competition. (Almost every year, he goes to Pink Dot Okinawa to show his support.) In January 2017, he issued the "Rainbow City Urasoe Announcement'' and promoted LGBT-related seminars. In October 2017, he also sought the cooperation of the University of Ryukyus, Graduate School of Law, and organizations in support for sexual and gender diversity, to formulate regulations and policies. Ryudai Graduate School of Law submitted a draft of the "Inclusion of Sexual/Gender Diversity in Society Ordinance'' in February 2019. The city aimed to implement it in the spring of 2020. However, some organizations signed a petition against it, so the mayor had to postpone its implementation. (More information on this story from Pink Dot Okinawa 2020 Online) The proposal's delay is only temporary. From the results of surveys and workshops, the city saw an increasing trend of support for sexual and gender diversity. The city council finally submitted the proposal in February 2021.

 After all those ups and downs, this time, the council voted unanimously to pass the ordinance. What a relief! To Mayor Matsumoto and the Urasoe citizens, thank you for your zeal and hard work.

References:

Urasoe city council, the first to pass the "Sexual and Gender Diversity Ordinance" in Okinawa (Ryukyu Shimpo)
https://ryukyushimpo.jp/news/entry-1291310.html

Urasoe city passes the first sexual and gender diversity ordinance in Okinawa (Okinawa Times)
https://www.okinawatimes.co.jp/articles/-/725967

Source: https://www.outjapan.co.jp/lgbtcolumn_news/news/2021/3/27.html

Tuesday, March 23, 2021

Japan PM Suga is uncertain about extending the state of emergency

PM Suga raising his hand as he responded to a question from CDP Tetsuro Fukuyama during the Budget Committee meeting of the upper house of the Diet.
On his left is Internal Affairs and Communications Minister Ryota Takeda.
March 15, 2021 10:21 a.m. Photo by Reina Kitamura.

    CDP member Tetsuro Fukuyama questioned Japan PM Yoshihide Suga's decision to lift the state of emergency from the greater Tokyo area, which was made in response to the pandemic. "We see the numbers [of COVID-19 cases], but we still don't know if we should lift the state of emergency," Fukuyama commented.

 PM Suga explained, "The two-week extension was for the sole reason to ease the strain on our hospitals. We've only focused on tightening protocols for restaurants, but the number of new cases have gone down by 80%. This means that our protocols are extremely effective," he pointed out.

 "The decline of new infections is stabilizing, so we are not in the position to keep extending the state of emergency," he argued. PM Suga will make the final decision as he considers expert advice.

Source: https://www.asahi.com/articles/ASP3H3TFMP3HUTFK00G.html?iref=com_apitop

Wednesday, March 17, 2021

Ube city postpones implementation of the partnership system due to 80% opposition



 Ube, Yamaguchi -- Ube city was going to be the first city in the Yamaguchi prefecture to implement the partnership oath system, which acknowledges the partnership status of LGBT couples. However, at the end of 2020, 80% of the comments in the public forum were against the system. The city had planned to introduce the system around April, but there were many critical opinions and reasons opposing it like, "Maybe there aren't any LGBTQ couples here," which led to postponing the implementation to September.

 Out of the 217 posted responses, there were only 34 responses, or 16%, who agreed. "It will only worsen our declining birth rate." "There are other human rights issues we should pay more attention to." These are some reasons that those in opposition have provided.

 The City Council for the Promotion of Human Rights approved the drafted guidelines for the partnership system in November 2020 and solicited the public's opinion. Since many people expressed opposition against the system, more members of the council suggested delaying its implementation, saying that "it needs more time" during their meeting on February 18. The council plans to have educational programs such as seminars because the city is not as progressive as it was expected to be.

 This system is for LGBTQ+ couples who are already living in the city or are planning to move to the city. They will be issued a certificate once they submit their written oath. The system will grant couples different rights like living together in municipal housing and getting family discounts on cell phone plans. More urban areas outside the prefecture are continuing to introduce this system. 

Article by Yanagase Seiichirou

Source: https://mainichi.jp/articles/20210305/k00/00m/040/034000c

Wednesday, March 10, 2021

The Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare includes staff in vaccination site to vaccine priority group, due to high contact with visitors

    The Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare have announced that they will be including the personnel working at the vaccination site in the vaccine priority group. They will be inoculated at the same time as the elderly, and this guideline was incorporated into medical institutions late last month.

 The staff come into contact with a large number of visitors so there is a higher risk for them to get infected. Therefore, they should be included in the priority group. From the staff on the front desk to medical pre-examination, including the guides within the site are included in the vaccine priority group. Employees of contractors from privately-run vaccination sites will also be covered. However, staff who are in charge of preparing and setting up the site and those who have very limited contact with visitors are not included in the priority group.

 Vaccines for the medical staff have been distributed and have begun to be administered. The vaccine has been distributed to the municipalities at the same time as the start of the inoculation of the elderly, so the staff will also be vaccinated concurrently.

Source: https://yomidr.yomiuri.co.jp/article/20210301-OYT1T50083/?catname=news-kaisetsu_news

Monday, March 8, 2021

Removing the gender entry field from public high school admission applications expands from 2 to 41 prefectures in a span of 2 years

    The movement for removing the gender entry field from applications for public high school admissions has quickly spread throughout Japan. This was done in consideration for the transgender community and other groups. There were only 2 prefectures that were working towards the removal of the gender form field on the spring entrance examination of 2019, but it has increased to 41 prefectures this spring. The movement has spread quite quickly in a span of two years.

 Asahi Newspaper interviewed 47 prefectural education committees in December 2020. Out of 47, 41 answered that they would remove the gender entry field on the admission application. 7 of the 41 prefectures will be implementing it this spring for their entrance examination.

 Local governments support this movement mainly to give consideration to the transgender community and gender minorities. However, they have also provided other reasons to abolish the gender entry field. "Gender isn't relevant to selecting applicants, so we concluded that it's not important information to collect" (Aomori prefecture). "Of course, we do this to support gender minorities, and if we remove the gender entry field, it won't be much of an inconvenience. Looking at what other prefectures have done, we're debating if asking for one's gender is important at all" (Yamanashi prefecture). "Aside from legal documents, the whole prefecture can eliminate the gender entry field for all applications" (Hyogo prefecture). "This is just part of the initiative to promote the movement prefecture-wide, starting with the prefectural office and the prefectural board of education. In 2017, applications had multiple choices for gender. From 2018-2019, it was a fill-out form. By 2020, the gender entry field had been abolished altogether. The movement was implemented in different stages" (Mie Prefecture). These statements prove that there are municipal governments that are looking over other documents to remove gender entry fields aside from school applications.

 Even if they eliminate the gender form field on the applications, high schools can still obtain the student's gender, which is recorded on the family register, because junior high schools have their genders on their school records. "There are still school records that are kept hidden from the students, which have records of their gender. Schools use these as convenient references for tasks such as forming class sections, etc" (Okinawa prefecture).

 The 6 prefectures that still have gender entry fields are as follows: Yamagata, Tochigi, Gunma, Chiba, Tokyo, and Shizuoka. Yamagata plans to abolish it in spring of 2022, while Tochigi is still up for debate. (There have been criticisms against Tokyo. Tokyo has an LGBT discrimination ban ordinance, but the removal of gender entry field doesn't seem to be included in it.) 

 The admission application is the document that is to be submitted at the time of the entrance examination. The applicant has to fill in their name and their home address on it. All of the prefectures had either multiple choice or fill-in forms for the gender entry field in 2018, but in 2019, Osaka and Fukuoka led the initiative to remove it.

 An Asahi Newspaper article featured a transmasculine third-year student from a metropolitan high school. He said that he had scribbled down "female" on his application the day before the entrance exam, but 3 years later, he wrote down "male" for his resume as he was job-hunting because he wanted to work with his real gender identity. His high school teacher supported him and had his back. They said, "If that becomes the reason you don't get the job, this school will work hard for you to get one."
 
    Students like him appreciate the increase of municipalities that will remove the gender entry field, and are hoping that the whole nation will abolish it altogether. "Gender is something I decide for myself. I think it's unfair that anyone might have to worry about filling in gender entry fields because not all prefectures have abolished it," the student said.

 A principal of a public junior high school in the Tokyo metropolitan region, where they are taking gender-sensitive measures, welcomes the idea of removing the gender entry field to lessen the discomfort of people filling it in. However, at the same time, there are still many activities at school like physical check-ups and separating boys and girls for certain classes. The principal wonders to what extent transgender students are accepted by their fellow students and their guardians. "I can't help but say that the system, too, is still discriminative," they pointed out, "removing the gender entry field will not solve the many issues that still exist."
 
 Abolishing the gender entry field has been taken up to the National Diet. Taiga Ishikawa, an openly gay member of the House of Councillors, asked about this movement within various prefectures during a meeting with the Committee of Education and Science on November 26 of last year. The Director of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Takimoto Yutaka answered, "It depends on their Board of Education if they will use applications without gender entry fields. We have to respect the judgment and the decision of each prefecture." Councillor Ishikawa also brought up an issue from the transgender community about having the Japan Standards Association (JSA) to stop requiring gender on resume templates. "The format of the school transcript will be based on what the employer needs and that will be the job of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare and other related organizations," Director Takimoto commented.

 Miho Mitsunari, the vice president of Nara Women's University (Gender and Law), stated, "As schools continue to support gender minorities, there are still students who take the entrance exam wearing uniforms that differ from their registered gender. There shouldn't be a need to fill in one's gender on application forms or examination slip, which other people might notice. However, at the same time, it is still important to obtain that information on documents such as their school records, so that we can release statistics on the ratio of men and women who passed the exam. Without it, then we won't be able to see the gender disparity in issues like unequal admissions to medical school. It is dangerous to disregard the gender ratio within the government or in society while we take into account our support for gender minorities. It is important to separate and organize when and where gender is needed to be mentioned in a document."

 For that transgender examinee, having to put gender on the application form made him almost trip over the entrance of the building. It haunted him later when he had to write his gender on his resume and entry sheet while he went job-hunting.

 Kokuyo released a resume template without a gender entry field last December in response to JSA and to the community's long-held wish of removing it. This is a huge step towards progress.

 Before this, Unilever Japan had already released application forms without gender entry fields and implemented a policy to not ask about gender in their 2020 employment selection.

 Local governments are also moving towards not asking for one's gender for their employment exams. Kumamoto city made writing one's gender on employment forms voluntary, except for jobs that require physical strength like firefighting.
  
 "End gender discrimination in employment!" cried the university students and manner lecturers (BuzzFeed Japan). "I got rejected for a job..." ABEMA TIMES writes the plight of transgender students on job-hunting. Resumes, photos, and interviews have become hurdles for the trans community. Only women can wear skirts. Make-up is required. These rules have become problematic.

 A former student, Mizuno, spoke of their job-hunting experience as a nonbinary (X-gender) person. "I can't stand being told that I have to wear this or that because I'm a man or a woman. The unspoken rules of job-hunting and only having two options for professional attire is heart-breaking. I gave up on wearing clothes that fit my gender expression when I didn't get the job one time."

 These are examples of job-hunting sexism. These gendered expectations without any logical basis are being pushed onto job-seekers. People started a petition to reform sexist expressions and to propose professional attire for diverse genders rather than sticking with only 2 genders as advertised by major companies and suit companies.
 
 In September last year, Pantene featured a trans job-seeker on a newspaper ad. It became a huge topic for discussion. Hopefully, people will come to respect that there are more diverse genders than being "man" or "woman."
 
 Abolishing the gender entry field from applications will not solve everything. It won't matter if school systems cannot protect their transgender students or if their parents don't understand and accept them. It won't matter if employers won't let transgender employees work under their true gender identity or if their coworkers won't understand and accept them. Aside from legal measures to prevent harrassment and outing incidents, LGBTQ policies also need to include protection for the transgender community. (If you are someone wondering how you can help the LGBTQ community, you can contact OUT JAPAN)

 I will end this article with the words of the Director of the GID Society, Professor Mikiya Nakatsuka of Okayama University:"Having a different gender identity from the one you were assigned at birth and having dysphoria is not an illness or a disability. "The illness is not the person themselves, but the bigots who refuse to understand and continue to discriminate in this society."


References:
Removing the gender entry field from public high school admission applications expands from 2 prefectures in 2019 to 41 prefectures in 2021
https://www.asahi.com/articles/DA3S14792330.html

"End gender discrimination in employment," cried university students and manner lecturers for abolition of gender entry field (Buzzfeed Japan)
https://www.buzzfeed.com/jp/sumirekotomita/syukatsu-sexism

"I got rejected for a job...": The hurdles created by resumes and interviews for job-hunting transgender students
https://times.abema.tv/news-article/8646138

Ending gender prejudice, Kumamoto removes gender entry field from resumes (Kumanichi Newspaper)
https://kumanichi.com/news/id102251

Source: https://www.outjapan.co.jp/lgbtcolumn_news/news/2021/2/14.html